What occurred to me, was that so much in going on in the last month than the last 5 years. Everything seems just so surreal… I feel pretty numb looking through these tinted glasses that only a varied source of information can give you, but along with that comes densensitization.
We are literally at the cusp of global transformation, the cards are lining up, the curtain’s about to rise. We have the Council on Foreign Relations telling you that ‘Al-Qaeda’ will stage a “False-Flag” Terrorist Attack to get the US into a War in Iran
The North American Union has been created, with not even a protest to make the mainstream news, I’ve even seen the new tax forms that businesses have to be enforced under by 2011.
Yet I feel numb
It seems to me, that the more people know of what’s going on, the more we become complacent with it. I’ll include myself in that criticism, and I’ll read in the paper how they’re scanning to arrest “dangerous” people , and I’ll just walk away because I’ve heard it all a million times before.
When I first found out about the New World Order, and all of it’s wickedness, I couldn’t sleep for three days, my hunger for knowledge was strong, it was almost like I was sustained by light and to see evil for what it was.
The funniest is when I talk to people off the street trying to get an opinion, if you will, of the common person’s thoughts and feelings living circa 2007, just to test the waters I’ll throw a few softballs for them, trying to get the thought process happening, but mostly What I’ve been seeing is pure apathy, or ‘yeah 9/11 was an inside job but did you see my new TV?”
That frightens me. There’s so much at stake, there’s so much history and work and sacrifice made so we could have a better life for ourselves, and yet people are content to sit and play with Chinese made gadgets, and clueless on the most basic foundations of life.
but when you walk down the street, you almost see the ghouls from ‘They Live’, really not a care in the world or a thought in the mind other than what’s been implanted in it, and the cheap baubles made by ‘indentured servants’ in overseas sweatshops.
It’s almost like people really believe they’re in some revolving world that can never be altered, but when you look at history, and how people had to fight and struggle, from birth to death, to secure some semblence of independence for themselves.
Much of Britain was exposed to bacteria sprayed in secret trials
Antony Barnett, public affairs editorObserver Sunday April 21, 2002
The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.
A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.
Many of these tests involved releasing potentially dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms over vast swaths of the population without the public being told.
While details of some secret trials have emerged in recent years, the 60-page report reveals new information about more than 100 covert experiments.
The report reveals that military personnel were briefed to tell any 'inquisitive inquirer' the trials were part of research projects into weather and air pollution. The tests, carried out by government scientists at Porton Down, were designed to help the MoD assess Britain's vulnerability if the Russians were to have released clouds of deadly germs over the country. In most cases, the trials did not use biological weapons but alternatives which scientists believed would mimic germ warfare and which the MoD claimed were harmless. But families in certain areas of the country who have children with birth defects are demanding a public inquiry. One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.
While the Government has insisted the chemical is safe, cadmium is recognised as a cause of lung cancer and during the Second World War was considered by the Allies as a chemical weapon.
In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii , which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius.
The report also reveals details of the DICE trials in south Dorset between 1971 and 1975. These involved US and UK military scientists spraying into the air massive quantities of serratia marcescens bacteria, with an anthrax simulant and phenol.
Similar bacteria were released in 'The Sabotage Trials' between 1952 and 1964. These were tests to determine the vulnerability of large government buildings and public transport to attack. In 1956 bacteria were released on the London Underground at lunchtime along the Northern Line between Colliers Wood and Tooting Broadway. The results show that the organism dispersed about 10 miles. Similar tests were conducted in tunnels running under government buildings in Whitehall.
Experiments conducted between 1964 and 1973 involved attaching germs to the threads of spiders' webs in boxes to test how the germs would survive in different environments. These tests were carried out in a dozen locations across the country, including London's West End, Southampton and Swindon. The report also gives details of more than a dozen smaller field trials between 1968 and 1977.
In recent years, the MoD has commissioned two scientists to review the safety of these tests. Both reported that there was no risk to public health, although one suggested the elderly or people suffering from breathing illnesses may have been seriously harmed if they inhaled sufficient quantities of micro-organisms.
However, some families in areas which bore the brunt of the secret tests are convinced the experiments have led to their children suffering birth defects, physical handicaps and learning difficulties.
David Orman, an army officer from Bournemouth, is demanding a public inquiry. His wife, Janette, was born in East Lulworth in Dorset, close to where many of the trials took place. She had a miscarriage, then gave birth to a son with cerebral palsy. Janette's three sisters, also born in the village while the tests were being carried out, have also given birth to children with unexplained problems, as have a number of their neighbours.
The local health authority has denied there is a cluster, but Orman believes otherwise. He said: 'I am convinced something terrible has happened. The village was a close-knit community and to have so many birth defects over such a short space of time has to be more than coincidence.' Successive governments have tried to keep details of the germ warfare tests secret. While reports of a number of the trials have emerged over the years through the Public Records Office, this latest MoD document - which was released to Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker - gives the fullest official version of the biological warfare trials yet.
Baker said: 'I welcome the fact that the Government has finally released this information, but question why it has taken so long. It is unacceptable that the public were treated as guinea pigs without their knowledge, and I want to be sure that the Ministry of Defence's claims that these chemicals and bacteria used were safe is true.'
The MoD report traces the history of the UK's research into germ warfare since the Second World War when Porton Down produced five million cattle cakes filled with deadly anthrax spores which would have been dropped in Germany to kill their livestock. It also gives details of the infamous anthrax experiments on Gruinard on the Scottish coast which left the island so contaminated it could not be inhabited until the late 1980s.
The report also confirms the use of anthrax and other deadly germs on tests aboard ships in the Caribbean and off the Scottish coast during the 1950s. The document states: 'Tacit approval for simulant trials where the public might be exposed was strongly influenced by defence security considerations aimed obviously at restricting public knowledge. An important corollary to this was the need to avoid public alarm and disquiet about the vulnerability of the civil population to BW [biological warfare] attack.'
Sue Ellison, spokeswoman for Porton Down, said: 'Independent reports by eminent scientists have shown there was no danger to public health from these releases which were carried out to protect the public.
'The results from these trials_ will save lives, should the country or our forces face an attack by chemical and biological weapons.'
Isikoff, with a long-demonstrated weakness for single-source stories, turns out to be the stooge. (His book, "Uncovering Clinton," actually quotes an anonymous caller’s smutty allegations against Bill Clinton exactly one page before condemning Internet gossip Matt Drudgeas a "menace to... responsible journalism. ") -Gene Lyons, from Enron Style Journalism
Isikoff showed his clerk status and subservience to political power in the 90's.
His behavior then demonstrated that he works for the ultra-right wing elements the U.S. government - that attempted to over-thrown Clinton and that later came to be our fascist police state designers!
Credibility? Pathetic. He made a pot of money working with the out of control Clinton Cock Hunter Kenneth Starr.
"Honoring her last minute request, I did a favor for Kathleen Willey and trusted a reporter, in opening the door to Michael Isikoff I literally stepped in front of a freight train. it was a train ultimately controlled by Kenneth Starr and loaded with all the power and financial resources of the United States Government. I became known as "Criminal No. 99-9A." I never even saw it coming... " -Julie Hyatt Steele
He still has his job (I wonder why?!) I guess that makes people believe he's all right!
Interesting how defensive these con artists become when asked simple questions. If they've got nothing to hide why the hysteria? And yea Isikoff, what did happen to the "plane" which allegedly hit the Pentagon? Good question.
Why is the establishment media so out of touch on 9/11?
May 22, 2007 --
Last Sunday, C-Span 2 aired a session from the 2007 LA Times Festival of Books, called the "Age of Spin Panel," whose purpose was to explore media deception during the Bush years – a big topic. The panel consisted of Newsweek journalist Michael Isikoff, political consultant Frank Nuntz, Salon.com columnist Joe Conason, and Mother Jones magazine reporter David Goodman, all of whom, with the possible exception of Goodman, are well-known figures within the Washington media establishment. A number of topics were discussed – the Iraq war, the outing of Valerie Plame – but I found the panel chiefly interesting for what was said about 9/11.
During the question and answer session, the discussion turned to the attacks, and to what extent the U.S. media failed to do its job in reporting about them. A woman stood up and said that she was from New York, that she had witnessed the collapse of the towers, that what she had seen she felt resembled a controlled demolition, and that she wanted to know what the panel thought about the media's complicity in establishing an atmosphere of disinformation after the attacks. Instead of responding to her question, however, Mr. Luntz ignored her completely and requested that a man in the back row please lower a sign reading "9/11 Truth Now" so that those who "had traveled a long distance that day" could enjoy the panel. "That," said Mr. Luntz, "is civility."
Naturally somewhat annoyed, the woman then asked Mr. Luntz why he wasn't answering her question, at which point Mr. Luntz aggressively interrogated her, "who do you think did it, who do you think did it?" which, as the woman then pointed out, was not the question she was asking. What was so odd about all of this was to see how quickly the established parameters of the debate broke down as soon as the 9/11 question was introduced, how these four highly intelligent professional journalists who a moment ago had been calmly and rationally answering the audience's questions were changed very quickly into four guys who clearly felt like they were being personally attacked by members of the audience, which, as far as I could tell, wasn't the case at all. In the end, the thing I took away from watching the whole scene was that, for whatever reason, when it comes to dealing with this 9/11 issue – i.e. how much did the administration know beforehand about the attacks, to what extent can our own government be accountable, just what happened inside the buildings that day, why building 7 collapsed when no plane hit it, all perfectly reasonable questions that the 9/11 Commission itself was at a loss to fully explain – public intellectuals and professional journalists like Michael Isikoff, Joe Conason, Frank Luntz, and David Goodman are liable to experience a certain hysterical excitability that causes them to dismiss the issue outright, without taking the time to have a more nuanced understanding of the facts.
For instance, take the case of Joe Conason. After Mr. Luntz had turned the question on the questioner, Mr. Conason chimed in saying, "Oh, by the way, as far as I know, bin Laden confessed to being responsible for 9/11, which is why I supported the war in Afghanistan." Now, it is true that Bin Laden mentions his involvement in the attacks in the so-called "confession" video released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001, but what Joe Conason doesn't mention is what Muckraker Report editor Ed Haas learned when he phoned the FBI last June: that apparently there's no "hard evidence" linking Osama bin Laden to 9/11 and that the U.S. Justice Department has never formally indicted bin Laden for the attacks, as Ed Haas reported in his article "FBI: 'no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11,'" which was recently selected by Project Censored as one of the top 25 news stories censored by the corporate media. A good journalist might have asked the questions Ed asked in that article, such as:
So why doesn't the FBI view the "confession video" as hard evidence? After all, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel openly talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The identified participants of the video would be indicted, and if captured, the video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why is the Bin Laden "confession video" not carrying the same weight with the FBI? .."''"-->
Or a good journalist might have brought up what Seymour Hersh reported in the New Yorker in October of 2001, that prior to the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan there were a number of intelligence officials who expressed doubts about Osama bin Laden's capabilities. "This guy sits in a cave in Afghanistan and he's running this entire operation?" said one CIA official. "It's so huge. He couldn't have done it alone." Or a good journalist might have pointed out that on September 23, 2001 Secretary of State Colin Powell told a television interviewer that "we will put before the world, the American people, a persuasive case" showing that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, and a good journalist would have reminded his audience that, actually, that persuasive case was never made, and it wouldn't be until mid-December that the Bin Laden confession tape appeared, which means we invaded Afghanistan in early October on pretences that amounted to little more than a hunch.
This aside, however, Joe Conason's dismissal of the 9/11 issue pales in comparison to Newsweek's Michael Isikoff's, who in response to a second audience member's question as to why the collapse of WTC 7 was never mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report – again, a perfectly reasonable question – had this to say. (As you read it, imagine his voice escalating in excitement as he waves his hands above his head, the audience cheering him on):
You know, look, I am a natural skeptic about everything, whenever I find any evidence of government malfeasance, cover-ups, it's the kind of thing that gets my blood running, but I…this 9/11 stuff is nonsense, there was a thorough investigation by the 9/11 Commission, hundreds of investigators from all across the country, creditable people who looked at it, found not a scant of…nothing, nothing, to support any of this, and of course if you want to believe that this was all some giant conspiracy, that then involved not just the original thousands of conspirators who did it, but then the hundreds of people who were appointed to investigate it, and they all fell in on the same conspiracy, and none of them will talk to anybody, you're off in some other world, where political dialogue doesn't exist….my favorite one…you know, the pentagon, people say it wasn't a plane that hit the Pentagon…I was at the Pentagon the day after! I saw the plane wreckage…maybe it got planted in the middle of the day, by somebody and nobody noticed…and the other thing is - where'd the plane go? A plane took off, you know, it just vanished! This makes no sense whatsoever…it's just…we're already wasting too much time talking about it.
This was met with enthusiastic clapping from Mr. Luntz, after which the moderator of the panel told the audience, "I guess I will take the liberty of saying, I don't want to have that particular question raised again," a clear act of censorship on a panel whose purpose was to explore, among other things, the damaging effects on society of censorship in the media.
Mr. Isikoff mentions the 9/11 Commission, with its "hundreds of investigators from all over the country." So let's talk about Mr. Isikoff's much-lauded Commission. Here before me I have a copy of the "Family Steering Committee's Questions to the 9/11 Commission with Ratings of its Performance in Providing Answers," which was compiled by Mindy Kleinberg and Lorie van Auken, two of the 9/11 widows known as the "Jersey girls," who led the drive to form the 9/11 Commission, and who assisted in drawing up the list of questions that was eventually used. Unlike Mr. Isikoff, the widows were actually present at the 9/11 Commission and carefully monitored and graded the responses given to each question. Let's take a look at what they found:
On who was in charge of the country on the morning of 9/11 while the president was away from the National Military Command Center, and whether the President was informed or consulted about all decisions made in his absence: No answer.
On what defensive measures the President took in response to pre-9/11 warnings from eleven different nations about a terrorist attack, many of which cited an attack in the continental United States, and to what extent the President prepared any directives in response to these actions, and if so, with what results: No answer.
On why the President remained at the Sarasota, Florida elementary school for a press conference after he had finished listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, his presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children: No answer.
On what prompted the President's refusal to release the information regarding foreign sponsorship of the terrorists, as illustrated in the inaccessible 28 redacted pages in the Joint Intelligence Committee Inquiry Report, and on what actions the President personally taken since 9/11 to thwart foreign sponsorship of terrorism: No answer.
On why the bin Laden family members were granted the special privilege of being flown out of the United States when all commercial flights were grounded, a privilege not available to American families whose loved ones were killed on 9/11: No answer.
On which individuals, governments, agencies, institutions, or groups may have benefited from the attacks of 9/11, and how specifically: No answer.
On why no one in any level of the United States government has yet been held accountable for the countless failures leading up to and on 9/11: No answer.
On the reasons for the President's 14-month opposition to the creation of an independent commission to investigate 9/11 and why the President would have requested Senator Daschle to quash such an investigation: No answer.
On when the President first became aware of "Rebuilding America's Defenses" [RAD] proposed by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), on who introduced it to him, and on why after 9/11 the President seemed to have fully embraced the RAD plan: No answer.
On why there has not been a consistently steady push since 9/11 to capture or kill bin Laden: No answer.
On the types of federal rescue measures in place in the event of an attack on the nation, in terms of personal and equipment: No answer.
On why Osama bind Laden's profile on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted Fugitives poster does not include the 9/11 attacks: No answer. [Actually, thanks to Ed Haas of the Muckraker Report, we now have an answer to this one: according to the FBI, the reason 9/11 doesn't appear on the Most Wanted poster, is because there is "no hard evidence linking him to the 9/11 attacks."]
On the advice and plans of the Energy Advisory Council specifically as they related to pipeline development and gas/oil exploration in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other Middle Eastern countries, and the feasibility of such development or exploration specifically in those countries in 2001: No answer.
On whether there is a defense protocol to be followed in the event the nation is attacked, besides ensuring the succession to the presidency, and whether it was followed: No answer.
On why the White House set aside the recommendations of the Hart Rudman Report released in January, 2001, which predicted a catastrophic terrorist attack in the United States, passing all responsibility for dealing with the problem to FEMA, even though Congress had been willing to support the recommendations: No answer.
On addressing the issue of domestic terrorism, which the Vice-President was asked by President Bush in May, 2001, to oversee, on whom the Vice-President consulted and requested briefings from, on what his findings on the threat level were, on what the recommendations for improved security were that resulted from his study of domestic terrorism, on when they were made and to whom, and on what coordinated plans of action, directives, or protocols developed as a result: No answer.
On the level of support the 9/11 Commission could expect with regard to enacting the changes that they recommend: No answer.
On why the CIA didn't share vital information about terrorists with the FBI: No answer.
On the extraordinarily large number of stock puts on American and United airlines stock and others which were subsequently impacted by the terrorist attack, on whether the CIA was monitoring the financial markets in the weeks preceding 9/11, on whether such activity was viewed as a warning of an impending attack, on whether the CIA, in coordination with other agencies, both domestic and abroad, investigated the purchases of those stock puts, and on what the names of those individuals, investment groups, and others were who purchased the stock puts in question and the reasons they gave for anticipating a drop in the stocks of companies which coincidentally happened to have been severely impacted by 9/11: No answer.
On the role of the ISI, Pakistan's intelligence agency in aiding bin Laden and/or the al Qaeda from 1998 through the present: No answer.
I could go on – all in all, 70% of the questions in Mr. Isikoff's "creditable" report were never answered – but I'd be here all night. The truth is that when it comes to 9/11, neither Mr. Isikoff nor anyone else on that panel has any idea what they're talking about, and yet instead of learning the facts they patronizingly snub their audience for asking perfectly legitimate questions, questions for which the 9/11 families are still trying to get answers. Mr. Isikoff's solution to 9/11 is amnesia: let's forget about all of that unpleasant stuff, let's simply move forward, who cares about discovering the truth or holding people accountable or taking responsibility for our mistakes. Let's just be civil.
Nothing showed this condescending attitude better than Mr. Luntz's closing remarks. In the end, the most important thing, he seemed to be telling his audience, was not truth, but happiness:
I don't want you to walk away from here disappointed, and I don't want you to walk away from here angry, because the best thing about this session is that you got a chance to challenge me and my colleagues here, you got a chance to challenge the media…I know that they are going to be more careful, that they are going to be tougher…and that this is actually an example of the American process working, not failing, so please walk out of here feeling that it is a good thing that on national television you can have your point of view and you can have your say.
And the Jersey widows, Mr. Luntz? When are they going to have their say?
----------------- Bulletin Message ----------------- From: '>Pan Man Date: May 19, 2007 11:42 AM
September 11, 1990: President Bush reveals a plan to destroy America and ... all » establish a one-world government. He calls it "a big idea, a New World Order".
The NWO Octopus was too weak to carry out his vision in 1990 because the news media are not under total control. The Octopus spend the next ten years planning a "New Pearl Harbor" event that will terrorize the American Public into abandoning their Bill of Rights and join a Global Fascist Police State where cruel and unusual torture is common and resistance is met with secret detention, mind-altering drugs, and execution.
The Octopus plans to enforce their scheme through the use of little-understood high-tech weaponry and intensive propaganda spread through the news media.
Using an imaginary threat of global "Islamic Terrorism" the Octopus enlists the Neo-cons, Zionists, and Right-Wing Christians to spread their propaganda, making empty promises to each group. Little do they realize that as soon as the Octopus takes total control, Israel and the Religious will be betrayed, and all of mankind will serve only one master: The Octopus.
Loose Change and Terrorstorm helped open your eyes, now see through the lies of the mainstream media and understand clearly what is happening.
With their tentacles carefully placed in strategic positions within the FBI, the Justice Dept, and the Military, the Octopus decides to attack at the Dawn of a New Millenium, exactly 11 years after their plan was announced by the elder President Bush, King George I.
----------------- Bulletin Message ----------------- From: Save Our Troops,The WE Wont Forget 911 OLYMPICS Date: May 17, 2007 1:04 PM
Enjoy your FreeDumb!
These alleged Hijackers are still alive.... ALIVE i tell you!!
Satam al Suqami, Wail and Waleed al Shehri (two brothers) Both Alive, Abdul Aziz al Omari Alive, Fayez Banihammad (from the UAE), Ahmed al Ghamdi, Hamza al Ghamdi, Mohand al Shehri Alive, Saeed al Ghamdi Alive, Ahmad al Haznawi, Ahmed al Nami Alive, Majed Moqed, and Salem al Hazmi Alive (the brother of Nawaf al Hazmi).
How can the 9/11 Commission be taken seriously when they refer to alive 'hijackers'?
Remote controlled drones and Trillions of $$$'s missing from the Pentagon Inventory and Budget..
NO hijacked plane here! stare at the top of the post and watch the shape of the drone appear and disappear, appear and disappear.... hahaha and they thought we wouldnt notice it in this junk quality 4 frames they sent us from the Pentagon on 911.
84 high quality digital cameras on that roof, and THIS is all we get?
Osama videos were faked, ...Osama is a CIA agent, AlQaeda is a fictional entity
http://www.nywtc911.com/osama.htm
and I KNOW... No Hijackers carried this Gold out from under the WTC!
Unknown to most people at the time, $650 million in gold and silver was being kept in a special vault four floors beneath Four World Trade Center. 2
An article in the TimesOnline gives the following rundown of precious metals that were being stored in the WTC vault belonging to Comex. 3
Comex metals trading - 3,800 gold bars weighing 12 tonnes and worth more than $100 million Comex clients - 800,000 ounces of gold with a value of about $220 million Comex clients - 102 million ounces of silver, worth $430 million Bank of Nova Scotia - $200 million of gold The TimesOnline article is not clear as to whether the $200 million in gold reported by the Bank of Nova Scotia was part of the $220 million in gold held by Comex for clients. If so, the total is $750 million; otherwise $950 million.
911 Involved more than what meets the EYE!!! Open your MIND! I worked on this for months, please take at least a few hours to go over the material here, it ALL has to be looked at to understand the BIGGER picture... ( I made it as concise as possible, and that wasnt easy)...so PLEASE, make some popcorn, put your feet up, and discover why there is so much controversy now about the 'No Plane' evidence... or 'lack of' plane evidence. I'm NOT saying that 'No Thing' hit anything... i AM saying that 'No Plane' evidence, is present if you consider the entire scope of evidence, and the 'lack' of plane eveidence.
There's no quick answer for this info... it ALL needs to be reviewed together before you just read the title and reject it. There is good reason for this article also, i know we all know that 911 was an inside job... but there's a lot more to it than what is being told by the leaders of the truth movement, and it should not be over looked.
The articles which i have linked below, are well worth reading... and in this bulletin are the videos and interviews of Jules Naudet... please see all, and read all... the article's about Naudet fakery, are a 65 incidents of luck, and point by point effort to explain how Jules Naudet, couldnt have possibly gotten that shot... and i myself have questioned and scrutinized the Naudet footage and interviews, as they never did add up in my mind either.
This is a big animal... maybe thats why i have such a fondness for " 911 Octopus" (see video at bottom of page)... i wrote some articles a while back about the truth movement fragmenting, partly due to some who are making large sums of money and getting lots of air time captilizing on 911 and with the GCN being owned and funded by ABC and Disney, we have to consider they may have an agenda of their own, ... the other being the scholars, who are intelligent men and women arguing over what can, and cant be proven with physics.
There are a lot of theories out there, and a lot of physical evidence, inspite of what was destroyed.. eyewitnesses have been a large part of my focus due to the lack of matter to examine, but certainly ones eyes can tell us a lot, and i am an eyewitness also, and so are you, if you consider what we saw on the only footage we have to work with.
Consider this, there is only one shot of the first plane crashing,(and 1/2 of another as was discovered much later).And as these 'Plane deniers' keep cropping up, so do more films of planes hitting the towers, (and thats curious in and of itself that a few months ago, these clips ahd never been seen before... until 5 years later, and only when the questions about the planes started getting wind?) The people who pulled off 911 in the first place are making TRILLIONS! I think they can make as many doctored films as it takes to cover their asses after the fact. (and after all is said and done, remember that all the planes disappeared off of radar, sattelite, and air traffic control blips).
First of all we all know that 'No Plane' hit WTC 7, 'No Plane' was discovered in the HOLe in Shanksville, 'No Planes' were scrambled to intercept, 'No' availability of the 'Plane's' black box recorders, as questioned by
and 'No' one SAW a 'Plane' hit the Pentagon, other than 'mock' witnesses... as seen in the true Operation Northwoods style of flase flag ops- CLICK HERE (declasified document outlines a plan to fake planes, and create 'mock' witnesses, victims, and staged funerals)
yet we also know there were 84 cameras surrounding the PENTAGON, all high quality digital. we do have some 'mock' testimonies, (how convenient, since they wont show us the footage)... while the testimonies of people like Sam Danner .. who described a Global Hawk hitting the Pentagon, get retracted, (if they were threatening your son, youd probably do the same).
So we have 'NO Plane'footage of THE Pentagon,, yet all of a sudden, years later, we have 44 clips of planes hitting the towers, most of them from a good distance, and only the second tower, so they are smokey, grainy, far away, and unclear. Ok, a few people, 'sat' on these films and didnt want to share them with the world, till years later.... that makes sense.... not.
So why edit planes INTO the WTC footage, yet NOT show us planes at the Pentagon?
Thanks, i was hoping you'd ask THAT question... and if you bear with me, i think i can explain it.
Consider this guy in 911 Mysteries, claiming he "witnessed a Boeing kareenining into the towers", and subsequently explaining "and then they collapsed , due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense". (Thus giving the 'Official story', a foundation for the public to 'buy').
and GW Bush saw it first... hmmm, was that a direct feed from Jules Naudet's camera to the Presidential cam?
Oh, Naudet happened to catch the second plane crash, which is strange also, keep that in mind for later...
Naudet-2nd Plane footage
And this guy caught the second plane also... so why are so many saying there was 'No Plane"?
I often wondered why the Naudet Bros have been extremely reluctant to speak... after all, Jules could tell us more than almost any other person... he also filmed the lobby, and was supposedly one of the first to go into the towers with the other firemen... wouldnt he be anxious to tell the world what he saw, or is he that big of a coward, that he is afraid of being assasinated? After all, he was willing to go into a burning building, and risk his life to 'get the shot', ( did he rescue anyone? he IS a firefighter). Jules could certainly put a lot of myths to rest.
Nextel 911- Naudet's 'Inside the WTC' film
Charlie Rose Naudet Interview
So we turn to the Scholars, precious Steven Jones, love the man, so very rational and careful, a truely sweet spirit, and appeals to the greatest audience.
A scientist with not only extensive knowledge in physics, but actually 'coined cold fusion'(which has been refuted by many, although I find it to be noteworthy, and one of the main discoveries which got me thinking there may be something other than just thermate, (along with Rick Seigals video of the helicopters appearing to drop something into the buildings immediately prior to the collapse.(this is very curious, and not even Jones, or JONES, has even mentioned THIS piece of evidence....why not? we all saw it if we saw 911 Eyewitness).
Thermate CUTS steel, but it doesnt vaporize it, or account for 75% of the buildings mass not being present in the aftermath. Even in Controlled demolitions, most of the mass remains in the debris.
Steven Jones
WATCH, AND LISTEN CLOSELY... THIS WOMAN SAYS SHE SAW AN EXPLOSION, BUT NOT A PLANE... also watch the object flying in the smoke.
Most of the 'truthers' are more concerned with being accepted by the rest of the truth movement, than examining ALL the evidence. So Steven Jones has dis-associated with the scholars, because some, mainly Jim Fetzer and Judy Woods, have chosen to consider some things that cant neccesarily be 'proven' but DO have substantial 'foundation'for consideration. Rick Seigel has asked them all to take lie detectors, but i can understand why they refuse.. (they arent always accurate, and therefore may 'backfire'). Personally, 'I'd' take one.
The mere fact that http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm">Hollywood fakery and high frequency and particle beams exist, should be enough to consider them as playing into the equation... especially when the towers were a top down demolition, unprecedented, ...or were they? (see 911 Eyewitness full movie with another example of a 'top down' demo, which looks very much like 1st tower starting to topple then exploding in mid air). So why are they even saying THAT was a first?
What did those helicopters drop into the Towers? And Why is nobody talking about it? (Hey, wait a minute, does this refute my 'No Plane' theory? Helicopters ARE Planes, and we DID see those!)
Rick Siegel didnt see the planes either, but was an eyewitness, and filmed the destruction of both towers, and WTC 7, (which he was told hours before hand, was 'going to' collapse). Siegel made a very interesting documentary, which analyzes his footage against news footage on 911.
911 EYEWITNESS (movie trailer)
Were they some kind of Cold Fusion device? (Why doesnt Steven Jones talk about them? I dont know.)... They sure were bright flashes, and uniform in shape. Did Siegel 'effect' them in? What would he have to gain by altering his footage?
Please, show me an eyewitness, (that you know personally), who was there, and saw, and HEARD a plane... i welcome that info, i havent found it yet, in over 7000 hours of my 911 research... (other than the MOCK witness testimonies, (on NewsCorp media), which were laid out in the Operation Northwoods style of planning).
I hope that youve taken the time to scrutinize what i put together here, and hope that we all can discover some of these things on our own. some times it takes more than just experts...
It does no good to have an IMAGINATION, and not USE it!
The 8 Arm Monster of a LIE! 911 OCTOPUS!
IN PLANE SITE... debunking the debunkers
Chairman Joint Chiefs Myers says military knows that unmanned drones used in 911 attacks.
What made this hole after crashing through 3 rings of the Pentagon?
Nice to see a simple well made 9/11 truth video. Most importantly, the motive is made clear. During my own 9/11 research back in 2001, all evidence pointed toward the protection of the PetroDollar, being the US Achilles heal. The US Economy is extremely fragile, and due to greedy and profiteering corporations and trans national elites, the petro dollar has allowed the US economy dominate the world financial markets. This is a criminal scam of the highest proporations. In 2001, I foresaw that IRAQ and IRAN would need to fall in order to safe guard the US Economy. The IRAQ invasion confirmed the hypothethis, this was a war about money and control of of the world money supply system. The US must take out IRAN to secure their stranglehold of the world economy. This act WILL turn China and Russia into US enemies and be the start of very hard times for the US and its people. The compliance of the US media and the ignorance of the US people has allowed these actions since Sep 11 to take place, now the consequences of these actions will begin to unfold. Have faith, be strong, trying times are about to fall upon us all, and a great opportunity now exists to create a new, better and sustainable way of life.
Be sure to watch this video, and do some of your own research on the petro dollar. Be warned there is another version of this video on You Tube that has been edited removing all references to the petrodollar.
It is also important to note that the Day before Sep 11, Donald Rumsfeld was giving the Military a serve over trillions of unaccounted $$. He was threatening an investigation to the missing funds. I believe now this was simply a way to threaten high placed military officials to comply with what was about to happen, as after Sep 11, all threats vanished, and the military recieved more funds than ever before. Comply or be exposed. Your either With us or Against US.
----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------From: High Tech WeaponDate: May 12, 2007 7:03 PM Please view both videos and please visit all links below.
This website provides responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report by senior military, intelligence and government officials. It provides experienced professional opinions about the terrorist attacks on the world trade center and the pentagon
9/11, WTC, September 11, 911 Eyewitness, helicopter, chopper, flashes of light, loose change, planes, polarized light, north tower, south tower, coverup, conspiracy, correct me if I'm wrong
The video is pretty revealing. It appears the thermite/explosives in the building that they used caught on fire due to damage near the building corner, and it really made a storm of sparks. I hope Steven Jones runs with this thing... Ultimately...if I was still a mason, I'd be sending my lodge demit in TODAY...because the secret societies have become so EXTREMELY criminal, that they are unsustainable. After a short stay with the masons in 1992, I managed to get the hell away from the group. They wanted to bring me back in (why? I dunno), but they are so corrupt, that they can't couldn't even corrupt me. The system is so heinous that their traps and enticements came off as comical and bizarre... I guess I really was dealing with the
9/11, WTC, September 11, 911 Eyewitness, helicopter, chopper, flashes of light, loose change, planes, polarized light, north tower, south tower, coverup, conspiracy, correct me if I'm wrong
In support of the 9-11 families struggle for truth. We are a national organization calling for a complete investigation into 9-11 and the evidence for Bush Administration complicity. Stop the 9-11 coverup!
Narrated by Dr. Shyam Sunder, lead investigator of the federal building and fire safety investigation into the disaster, this audio slide show details the series of structural, fire-related, and other events that occurred within the towers as they progressed toward sudden, catastrophic collapse.
The real danger posed by the 9/11 Truth Movement isn't paranoia; it is that it will discredit and deform the salutary skepticism Americans increasingly show toward their leaders, <b>The Nation</b> says.
Morgan, Reynolds, Morgan Reynolds, 9-11, 9/11, 911, september 11th, controlled demolition, WTC, conspiracy, JFK, No More Games, Liberty Dollar, John F. Kennedy, Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse, Skeptical New Yorkers, The New Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor, Gold, Silver, Bullion, Federal Reserve, Greenspan, Burranke
Most people hate and fear Osama Bin Laden. He is accused of being a mass murderer and an enemy of free people. That being said, the man is an amazing magician. He is undeniably, the most talented of all of the illusionists of today and for that matter, any day. Don't believe me? Read on.
Dr. Postert & Old Nick - O
-
There Is Justice
With this inspiration, we are given hope that the Universe may in fact be
Just. And by this sign we are given inspiration to stay the co...
Osha Neumann, spoke at Surreal Estate
-
Osha Neumann is in my "Paradise" blog, since he imagined the Paradise that
is this world, but is not yet manifest, and tried and tries to bring it
about." ...
F11 No Planes 9/11 Truth Rap
-
Activist - F11
Lyrics:
"Yeah So on 9/11...theres a whole bunch of different ideas on what
happened...
who was responsible...there's all this stuff that pe...
