Sunday, February 25, 2007

The 'No Plane Deniers" a whole new truth 911 movement?

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: FREE FALL (reality theorist)
Date: Feb 25, 2007 11:54 AM


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: frEinLy Fier ll9 reLAvTicN (eMenY TeRriBaList)
Date: Feb 25, 2007 11:38 AM


I Am the one who wrote the no plane whacko bulletin... and i believe that it is extremely relevant.... because it shows who was complicit in the attacks... other than the ones we are focussing on in general... like Disney for instance... and the Naudet Bros... (who are they really?) Did Jules Naudet even film that? Hope you'll reconsider getting this info out... because people need to know the whole story, not just cherry pick what is publicly acceptable... yeah be prepared to be called a whacko... Did you ever wonder why so many officials, who know it was an inside job, are too cowardly to come forward? Because theyre afraid of being called a nut? Brother, our kids arent afraid to DIE, but these officials are afraid of name calling?

Who propelled the idea that we should only look at ONE little aspect of explosives? Steven Jones? Consider this... if thermite was used to cut steel in the clean up... it would completely make Jones obsolete.... and where do we go from there?

The bulletin i compiled ... (please have a look when you have time). It is now titled... "How many times will it take?" (etc) I also included a funny, but accurate prelude written by 'Pan Man' ... isnt it time we stopped cherry picking and worrying about who's going to call us names, and get the 'real' dis info agents exposed? Ive exchanged emails with Rick Siegel, and he told me that even the people who made 911 Mysteries, altered and mis represented HIS own footage, and Both Jonses refused to work with him unless he 'omitted' anything to do with the helicopters, which he not only saw in his binoculars, but caught on film, dropping something into the WTC Tower, immediately before it collapsed.

then again... even Siegel doesnt want to consider Fetzer and Woods, and Reynolds research... but i understand... when they are not looking at HIS first hand info either... SHOULD THEY ALL TAKE LIE DETECTORS? I would myself... but i suppose the lie detectors .. can also LIE. I consider Rick Siegel to be the BEST Eyewitness to the WTC collapses, second only to William Rodriguez. Show me ONE person who actually witnessed a PLANE, and ill reconsider everything... until i find one... i maintain... there were NO PLANES! (see my bulletin please).

when you have the time... please dig a little deeper, and dont be afraid to be called a 'nut'... much worse things are going on out there... like genocide...
...which Disney has a big hand in also... not to mention child slave labor... if people dont look at the No Plane 'evidence'... they arent even getting close to the real perpetrators... we all know it was rich guys.. but 'heres a name for ya... Disney, and just because everybody loves Disneyland... well imagine.. he's not only selling you into slavery, but hes making it fun... psy ops... For Kids!

Hmmm... why am i not laughing?

Do the World a favor.... KILL your TV, and take your kids to the park, and actually PLAY with them!!!



earthica star*

Courage to Call Disney out!









Disney / ABC Fakery









Olbermann ABC Docudrama










You still belive they couldnt FAKE the planes? OK, just run with the thermate, 'concrete provable evidence' if thats all the backbone you got.

earthica
star*


Tricks are JUST FOR KIDS...

FOX Kids

ABC network, Vampires, Pirates and Aliens, programs for kids

CIA for kids


Global Guardians for kids




The Whitehouse for kids



US Treasury for kids



Reptilian Monsters for kids


Space toys for kids



Magic Bus for kids


ET Preparedness for kids


demon clothing for kids

Space toys and Aliens for kids

UFO's for kids

anti-psychotic drugs, for kids


FEMA for kids



Govt for kids



Military for kids



More military for kids



FBI for kids

'Kids' are not children... they are baby goats... a close relative to 'sheep'.

No comments: