earthica'>http://earthica.mypodcast.com/">earthica star's podcast-talking about 'No Planes'.. click here to listen
No Planes
Audio'>http://www.livevideo.com/video/embedLink/696E7CE2A75542258DDAD56F24776E2B/192158/audio-proof-of-no-planes-theor.aspx">Audio proof of no-planes-theory
911 Involved more than what meets the EYE!!! Open your MIND!I worked on this for months, please take at least a few hours to go over the material here, it ALL has to be looked at to understand the BIGGER picture... ( I made it as concise as possible, and that wasnt easy)...so PLEASE, make some popcorn, put your feet up, and discover why there is so much controversy now about the 'No Plane' evidence... or 'lack of' plane evidence. I'm NOT saying that 'No Thing' hit anything... i AM saying that 'No Plane' evidence, is present if you consider the entire scope of evidence, and the 'lack' of plane eveidence.
There's no quick answer for this info... it ALL needs to be reviewed together before you just read the title and reject it. There is good reason for this article also, i know we all know that 911 was an inside job... but there's a lot more to it than what is being told by the leaders of the truth movement, and it should not be over looked.
The articles which i have linked below, are well worth reading... and in this bulletin are the videos and interviews of Jules Naudet... please see all, and read all... the article's about Naudet fakery, are a 65 incidents of luck, and point by point effort to explain how Jules Naudet, couldnt have possibly gotten that shot... and i myself have questioned and scrutinized the Naudet footage and interviews, as they never did add up in my mind either.
e star*
My letter to a 911 'no plane' skeptic, and all 911 truthers.
This is such a big animal... maybe thats why i have such a fondness for" 911 Octopus" (see video at bottom of page)...
i wrote some articles a while back about the truth movement fragmenting, partly due to some who are making large sums of money and getting lots of air time captilizing on 911 and with the GCN being owned and funded by ABC and Disney, we have to consider they may have an agenda of their own, ... the other being the scholars, who are intelligent men and women arguing over what can, and cant be proven with physics.There are a lot of theories out there, and a lot of physical evidence, inspite of what was destroyed.. eyewitnesses have been a large part of my focus due to the lack of matter to examine, but certainly ones eyes can tell us a lot, and i am an eyewitness also, and so are you, if you consider what we saw on the only footage we have to work with.
Consider this, there is only one shot of the first plane crashing,(and 1/2 of another as was discovered much later).And as these 'Plane deniers' keep cropping up, so do more films of planes hitting the towers, (and thats curious in and of itself that a few months ago, these clips ahd never been seen before... until 5 years later, and only when the questions about the planes started getting wind?) The people who pulled off 911 in the first place are making TRILLIONS! I think they can make as many doctored films as it takes to cover their asses after the fact.(and after all is said and done, remember that all the planes disappeared off of radar, sattelite, and air traffic control blips).
First of all we all know that 'No Plane' hit WTC 7, 'No Plane' was discovered in the HOLe in Shanksville, 'No Planes' were scrambled to intercept, 'No' availability of the 'Plane's' black box recorders, as questioned by
Pilots'>http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org/">Pilots for 911 Truth-click here
and 'No' one SAW a 'Plane' hit the Pentagon, other than 'mock' witnesses...as seen in the true Operation'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tNcsjoy0m4&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fbulletin%2Emyspace%2Ecom%2Findex%2Ecfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dblog%2Eview%26friendID%3D32694618%26blogID%3D234102050%26Mytoken%3D3064A7C0">Operation Northwoods style of flase flag ops- CLICK HERE (declasified document outlines a plan to fake planes, and create 'mock' witnesses, victims, and staged funerals)yet we also know there were 84 cameras surrounding the PENTAGON, all high quality digital. we do have some 'mock' testimonies, (how convenient, since they wont show us the footage)... while the testimonies of people like Sam'>http://www.erichufschmid.net/EyewitnessToFlight77.html">Sam Danner .. who described a Global Hawk hitting the Pentagon, get retracted, (if they were threatening your son, youd probably do the same).
So we have 'NO Plane'footage of THE Pentagon,, yet all of a sudden, years later, we have 44 clips of planes hitting the towers, most of them from a good distance, and only the second tower, so they are smokey, grainy, far away, and unclear. Ok, a few people, 'sat' on these films and didnt want to share them with the world, till years later.... that makes sense.... not.
So why edit planes INTO the WTC footage, yet NOT show us planes at the Pentagon?
Thanks, i was hoping you'd ask THAT question... and if you bear with me, i think i can explain it.
Consider this guy in 911 Mysteries, claiming he "witnessed a Boeing kareenining into the towers", and subsequently explaining "and then they collapsed , due to structural failure because the fire was just too intense". (Thus giving the 'Official story', a foundation for the public to 'buy'). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnhuKKl5Fvw We were TOLD it was Passenger planes, and THAT story had to be corraberated.
You see, It was easier to fake some footage of planes hitting the towers, without anyone questioning or scrutinizing them, than to edit a plane into the high quality Pentagon footage... which would surely show what 'really happened THERE, in clear digital format, .... experts could PROVE, it was edited... whereas, if we were psychologically made to believe we saw planes in New York, it would be very difficult to convince people later, that THOSE films were edited... even if THEY were PROVED, to be faked... the idea had been planted in our minds, and 'set in', (once we believe something it's much harder to un-believe it, ...and even harder to admit we may be wrong).
More people were at the WTC, so why are there so few who actually 'SAW or HEARD' a plane?... Most of the NY witnesses, only say they saw or heard 'an explosion'... and most of them say... they 'didnt' see a plane at all, but witnessed the explosion, and thought it was a bomb.
Are you beginning to see where im going with this now? Please bear with me a little longer, and watch the videos and read the articles below.
Naudet'>http://911foreknowledge.com/staged.htm">Naudet film Staged... Clcik Here, this is excrucuatingly long, but without reading it, you may not get the FULL picturehttp://911foreknowledge.com/staged.htm
also'>http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/fvfake/">also CLICK HERE for another very important article on Naudet Fake, great photos and videos too, a must see, to make this story complete http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/fvfake/
Naudet footage of 1st Plane crash
and GW Bush saw it first... hmmm, was that a direct feed from Jules Naudet's camera to the Presidential cam?
Oh, Naudet happened to catch the second plane crash, which is strange also, keep that in mind for later...
Naudet-2nd Plane footagehttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8327638485531107964&q=naudet+brothers+documentary*naudet 2nd plane
And this guy caught the second plane also... so why are so many saying there was 'No Plane"?
I often wondered why the Naudet Bros have been extremely reluctant to speak... after all, Jules could tell us more than almost any other person... he also filmed the lobby, and was supposedly one of the first to go into the towers with the other firemen... wouldnt he be anxious to tell the world what he saw, or is he that big of a coward, that he is afraid of being assasinated? After all, he was willing to go into a burning building, and risk his life to 'get the shot', ( did he rescue anyone? he IS a firefighter). Jules could certainly put a lot of myths to rest.
Nextel 911- Naudet's 'Inside the WTC' film
Charlie Rose Naudet Interview
So we turn to the Scholars, precious Steven Jones, love the man, so very rational and careful, a truely sweet spirit, and appeals to the greatest audience.
A scientist with not only extensive knowledge in physics, but actually 'coined cold fusion'(which has been refuted by many, although I find it to be noteworthy, and one of the main discoveries which got me thinking there may be something other than just thermate, (along with Rick Seigals video of the helicopters appearing to drop something into the buildings immediately prior to the collapse.(this is very curious, and not even Jones, or JONES, has even mentioned THIS piece of evidence....why not? we all saw it if we saw 911 Eyewitness).
Thermate CUTS steel, but it doesnt vaporize it, or account for 75% of the buildings mass not being present in the aftermath. Even in Controlled demolitions, most of the mass remains in the debris.
Steven Jones
WATCH, AND LISTEN CLOSELY... THIS WOMAN SAYS SHE SAW AN EXPLOSION, BUT NOT A PLANE... also watch the object flying in the smoke.
Most of the 'truthers' are more concerned with being accepted by the rest of the truth movement, than examining ALL the evidence. So Steven Jones has dis-associated with the scholars, because some, mainly Jim Fetzer and Judy Woods, have chosen to consider some things that cant neccesarily be 'proven' but DO have substantial 'foundation'for consideration. Rick Seigel has asked them all to take lie detectors, but i can understand why they refuse.. (they arent always accurate, and therefore may 'backfire'). Personally, 'I'd' take one. The mere fact that Hollywood'>http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm">Hollywood fakery and high frequency and particle beams exist, should be enough to consider them as playing into the equation... especially when the towers were a top down demolition, unprecedented, ...or were they? (see 911'>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2939164701791209176&q=911+eyewitness&hl=en">911 Eyewitness full movie with another example of a 'top down' demo, which looks very much like 1st tower starting to topple then exploding in mid air). So why are they even saying THAT was a first?
What did those helicopters drop into the Towers? And Why is nobody talking about it? (Hey, wait a minute, does this refute my 'No Plane' theory? Helicopters ARE Planes, and we DID see those!)
911'>http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6333886887490767906">911 Eyewitness Trailer 10 minutes http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6333886887490767906
Rick Siegel didnt see the planes either, but was an eyewitness, and filmed the destruction of both towers, and WTC 7, (which he was told hours before hand, was 'going to' collapse). Siegel made a very interesting documentary, which analyzes his footage against news footage on 911.
911 EYEWITNESS (movie trailer)
Were they some kind of Cold Fusion device? (Why doesnt Steven Jones talk about them? I dont know.)... They sure were bright flashes, and uniform in shape. Did Siegel 'effect' them in? What would he have to gain by altering his footage?
Please, show me an eyewitness, (that you know personally), who was there, and saw, and HEARD a plane... i welcome that info, i havent found it yet, in over 7000 hours of my 911 research... (other than the MOCK witness testimonies, (on NewsCorp media), which were laid out in the Operation'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods">Operation Northwoods style of planning).
I hope that youve taken the time to scrutinize what i put together here, and hope that we all can discover some of these things on our own. some times it takes more than just experts...
It does no good to have an IMAGINATION, and not USE it!
The 8 Arm Monster of a LIE! 911 OCTOPUS!
IN PLANE SITE... debunking the debunkers
Chairman Joint Chiefs Myers says military knows that unmanned drones used in 911 attacks.
What made this hole after crashing through 3 rings of the Pentagon?
It was 'NO PLANE'!
my respect to all
peace
Earthicastar*
911 TRUTH South Carolina
I have had my doubts as well, and refuse to discredit the NO PLANES idea as Dis-Info! it could and VERY WELL be TRUE!
No comments:
Post a Comment